Alan Poole
Subject:
|
RE: update on the Pleasurama site situation
|
Date:
|
05/11/2004 18:21:10 GMT Standard Time
|
From:
|
poole@btinternet.com
|
Reply To:
|
 |
|
|
To:
|
MichaelChild@aol.com
|
CC:
|
|
BCC:
|
|
Sent on:
|
|
|
|
|
Sent from the Internet (Details)
|
|
Received.
Alan Poole.
Hi Alan
I have put your email in the thanetonline.com site
I gather its on the Cabinet Agenda for the 10th of December
Kind regards Michael
Subject: RE: Emailing your councillors Date: 28/10/2004 23:11:48 GMT Standard Time From: poole@btinternet.com
Reply To:
|
|
To:
|
MichaelChild@aol.com
|
CC:
|
|
BCC:
|
|
Sent on:
|
|
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Dear Michael,
Sorry about delay in replying I've been away for a few days.
I'm not sure what the current position is. The last information I have is the same as yours (it was pulled from the Cabinet Agenda on the 14th and no reason was given).
I'm awaiting the next move.
Alan Poole.
Subj:
|
Re: FW: Pleasurama Site
|
Date:
|
21/04/2004 15:00:13 GMT Daylight Time
|
From:
|
Michael Child
|
To:
|
poole@btinternet.com
|
Right-click picture(s) to display picture options
|
Alan
I have in fact asked to look at David Greens copy too. one would have thought that something of this importance would be more readily available in Ramsgate, especially as the whole project seems to have ground to a halt because of a difference in what local people mean by consultation and what the planning department mean.
Please have a further look kind regards Michael
Subj:
|
Re: FW: Pleasurama Site
|
Date:
|
16/04/2004 11:36:49 GMT Daylight Time
|
From:
|
Michael Child
|
To:
|
poole@btinternet.com
|
Right-click picture(s) to display picture options
|
Alan
Thank you for your prompt and helpful reply. My only problem is that I can't find details of the first planning application, any help with this would be appreciated.
All the best Michael.
In a message dated 16/04/2004 07:09:25 GMT Daylight Time, poole@btinternet.com writes:
Subj: RE: FW: Pleasurama Site
Date: 16/04/2004 07:09:25 GMT Daylight Time
From: poole@btinternet.com
To: MichaelChild@aol.com
Sent from the Internet
Michael,
As I understand it, the Proposal that went before Council was defeated and cannot be re-submitted for six months. The Council cannot now sell the land to the developers unless they are prepared to use the previous planning permission (below the cliff top and landscaped). The Leader of the Council may not see it that way and may try to bring the Proposal back in a different form.
The Opposition were lucky this time as several Conservatives voted either deliberately or by mistake for the amendment.
This will probably not be allowed to happen again. The Leader was not amused!
It now depends on whether the developers will go ahead with the previous planning application or insist that the Council reverses the decision. They may also come forward with another (different) planning application or they may just go away.
The Planning Applications (both of them) are still legal.
I think we will just have to wait and see.
Regards,
Alan Poole.
-----Original Message-----
From: MichaelChild@aol.com [mailto:MichaelChild@aol.com]
Sent: 15 April 2004 11:39
To: poole@btinternet.com
Subject: Re: FW: Pleasurama Site
Dear Allan
I am trying to find out the situation with relation to the old Pleasurama site after the council decision not to sell the land to SFP for the development that would have extended above the cliff top.
Am I right in assuming that "a satisfactory development about, which meets the original concept accepted by Council on 5th December 2002" means that planning permission will have to be sought again.
Or has planning permission granted for the 5th December 2002 concept. If it has are the plans available for inspection.
Thank you in advance for your kind help in this matter.
Michael Child.