Vicki Williams
Subj:
|
Re: Pleasurama site
|
Date:
|
16/04/2004 12:45:32 GMT Daylight Time
|
From:
|
Michael Child
|
To:
|
Victoria.Williams@thanet.gov.uk
|
Right-click picture(s) to display picture options
|
Dear Vicki
Thank you for your prompt reply. Any information you have on the council meeting relating to the sale of the old Pleasurama site or what the decision made means in layman's terms would be very helpful.
The picture is of the site in the mid 1800s
All the best Michael.
In a message dated 16/04/2004 11:50:17 GMT Daylight Time, Victoria.Williams@thanet.gov.uk writes:
Subj: Re: Pleasurama site
Date: 16/04/2004 11:50:17 GMT Daylight Time
From: Victoria.Williams@thanet.gov.uk
To: MichaelChild@aol.com
Sent from the Internet
Dear Mr Child,
Many thanks for your e-mail. I have forwarded a copy to the Leader's Secretary, Mrs Rita Hancock to be looked at as a matter of urgency.
Yours sincerely
Vicki Williams
PA to the Chief Executive
Vicki Williams
PA to the Chief Executive
Chief Executive Office's
Thanet District Council
PO Box 9
Cecil Street
Margate
Kent CT9 1XZ
Direct dial telephone: (01843) 577002
Fax: (01843) 298874
e-mail: victoria.williams@thanet.gov.uk Web: www.thanet.gov.uk
>>><MichaelChild@aol.com> 04/15/04 01:25pm >>>
the e-mail address for the leader listed on the council website url
http://www.thanet.gov.uk/cgi-bin/members.pl?id=16of the council
sandy.ezekiel@lineone.net would not appear to work properly, either that or he doesn't reply to his
e-mail.
Could you plase foward the following to him.
Dear cllr. Ezekiel.
Please note that as I have contacted you in the past without receiving any
reply failure to reply in this instance will result in a formal complaint.
I am trying to find out the situation with relation to the old Pleasurama
site after the council decision not to sell the land to SFP for the development
that would have extended above the cliff top.
Am I right in assuming that "a satisfactory development about, which meets
the original concept accepted by Council on 5th December 2002" means that
planning permission will have to be sought again.
Or has planning permission granted for the 5th December 2002 concept. If it
has are the plans available for inspection.
Thank you in advance for your kind help in this matter.
Michael Child.
______________________________________________________________________________
This email has been checked for viruses by ArmourPlate,
http://www.armourplate.com, the multi-scanner anti-virus facility from Corpex.
Subj:
|
Pleasurama site
|
Date:
|
15/04/2004 13:25:37 GMT Daylight Time
|
From:
|
Michael Child
|
To:
|
Victoria.Williams@thanet.gov.uk
|
the e-mail address for the leader listed on the council website url http://www.thanet.gov.uk/cgi-bin/members.pl?id=16of the council sandy.ezekiel@lineone.net would not appear to work properly, either that or he doesn't reply to his e-mail.
Could you plase foward the following to him.
Dear cllr. Ezekiel.
Please note that as I have contacted you in the past without receiving any reply failure to reply in this instance will result in a formal complaint.
I am trying to find out the situation with relation to the old Pleasurama site after the council decision not to sell the land to SFP for the development that would have extended above the cliff top.
Am I right in assuming that "a satisfactory development about, which meets the original concept accepted by Council on 5th December 2002" means that planning permission will have to be sought again.
Or has planning permission granted for the 5th December 2002 concept. If it has are the plans available for inspection.
Thank you in advance for your kind help in this matter.
Michael Child.
|